This item is non-discoverable
Relationship between ‘employability’ and ‘higher education’ from global ranker and accreditor’s perspectives—does a gap exist between institutional policy making and implementation in taiwan higher education?
Date
2021-05-12
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Taylor & Francis Group
Abstract
Driven by global rankings and national quality assurance (QA) initiatives,
Taiwan’s higher education institutions were encouraged to develop stra
tegic plans and initiatives, in order to improve graduate student employ
ability. The purpose of this study is to explore the polices and strategies
adopted by Taiwanese higher education institutions, with a particular
focus on ‘employability’, in terms of standards and indicators of QS rank
ing and Higher Education Evaluation & Accreditation Council of Taiwan
(HEEACT) programme accreditation in 2017. This paper analysed strategic
plans and self-assessments reports from 20 Taiwanese universities in order
to determine the impact of ranking and QA on employability initiatives
and associated implications for institutional policy. The study presents
three major findings. First, the emergence of global ranking and national
quality assurance systems pressured Taiwanese universities to situate
several employability initiatives within their institutional strategic plans.
Second, Taiwanese universities applied varying approaches to the inte
gration of graduate employability into institutional policies and strategic
plans, according to ranking and national accreditation standards. Third,
the gap between institutional policy making and actual implementation
of employability initiatives exists in the Taiwanese context.
Description
Keywords
Employability; globalranking; nationalaccreditation; qualityassurance
Citation
Hou, A.Y.C. et al. (2021) “Relationship between ‘employability’ and ‘higher education’ from global ranker and accreditor’s perspectives—does a gap exist between institutional policy making and implementation in taiwan higher education?,” Journal of Education and Work, 34(3), pp. 292–312.