A smiling tree: an empirical evaluation on binomial tree methods for local volatility model

dc.Location2009 HG 1601 A44
dc.SupervisorDr Elango Rengasamy
dc.contributor.authorAl Alem, Mouaz Abdul Ghani
dc.date.accessioned2013-02-07T12:14:47Z
dc.date.available2013-02-07T12:14:47Z
dc.date.issued2009-09
dc.descriptionDISSERTATION WITH DISTINCTION
dc.description.abstractThis study compares between the standard Black-Scholes model and two local volatility models of implied binomial trees for PowerShare index options with regards to the pricing accuracy when evaluated against actual market prices. With Black, F. and M. Scholes (1973): The Pricing of Options and Corporate Liabilities. Journal of Political Economy, volume: 81, pp. 637 – 59 model as a benchmark, two local volatility models were analyzed: Derman and Kani's [Derman, E., & Kani, I., 1994. The Volatility Smile and Its Implied Tree. Risk, 7, 32–39] and Barle and Ckici’s [Barle, S and N. Cakici, (1998): How to Grow a Smiling Tree. The Journal of Financial Engineering, Vol. 7, No. 2, June 1998]. The model suggested by Barle and Cakici shows the best performance followed by Derman and Kani. Black-Scholes performance on the other hands was significantly lower than the two models. This is attributed to the fact that Black-Scholes model adopts a constant volatility regardless of option’s strike price or time to maturity. This finding is consistent at different moneyness levels and for different maturity periods.en_US
dc.identifier.other60026
dc.identifier.urihttp://bspace.buid.ac.ae/handle/1234/35
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherThe British University in Dubai (BUiD)en_US
dc.subjectempirical evaluationen_US
dc.subjectbinomial treeen_US
dc.titleA smiling tree: an empirical evaluation on binomial tree methods for local volatility modelen_US
dc.typeDissertationen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
60026.pdf
Size:
1.06 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: