TAX "VETO" AS A SPECIAL JURISDICTIONAL AND SUBSTANTIVE ISSUE IN INVESTOR-STATE ARBITRATION: NEED FOR REASSESSMENT?

dc.contributor.author	Kolo, Abba
dc.date.accessioned	2025-06-10T11:53:31Z
dc.date.available	2025-06-10T11:53:31Z
dc.date.issued	2009-03-01
dc.description.abstract	Despite the evolving nature of the global economy and the role of the state from the "nation-states" (Westphalia) into "market-states" with emphasis on privatization of hitherto state activities and competitive markets, which entail more external disciplines on state power especially in the areas of trade, invest- ment, and human rights,1 most governments still viewed taxa- tion as a central element of sovereignty and so are reluctant to accept extensive or heightened international disciplines on their taxing powers.2
dc.identifier.citation	Kolo, A. (2009) “Tax ``Veto″ as a Special Jurisdictional and Substantive Issue In Investor-State Arbitration: Need for Reassessment?,” Suffolk transnational law review., 32(2), pp. 475–492.
dc.identifier.issn	1072-8546
dc.identifier.uri	https://bspace.buid.ac.ae/handle/1234/3189
dc.identifier.uri	https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/sujtnlr32&div=25&id=&page=
dc.language.iso	en_US
dc.publisher	Hein Online
dc.relation.ispartofseries	Suffolk transnational law review.32, no. 2, (2009): 475-492
dc.title	TAX "VETO" AS A SPECIAL JURISDICTIONAL AND SUBSTANTIVE ISSUE IN INVESTOR-STATE ARBITRATION: NEED FOR REASSESSMENT?
dc.type	Article

Files

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1