A Comparative study of DAB and Arbitration as methods of resolving Construction Disputes

dc.SupervisorDr Abba Kolo
dc.contributor.authorAL KHAWAJA, DANA JAMAL
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-09T08:07:47Z
dc.date.available2023-02-09T08:07:47Z
dc.date.issued2023-01
dc.description.abstractThis dissertation’s purpose is to briefly introduce reasons for construction field disputes and to discuss the various DR methods applicable to resolve them, and their advantages and disadvantages. It then proceeds to elaborate on two of these methods, namely arbitration and dispute adjudication boards and take a closer look at two important factors considered when a person decides to approach DR, which are time and cost for resolving disputes through them. The doctrinal nature of this study allows comparison between the two methods using information collected by credited researchers. It is intended to highlight the overlooked benefits of DAB, and encourage its application in the UAE, since it is supported by FIDIC only and not by statute. It is concluded that while the cost of international arbitration may be 15% of a project’s value and may take years to resolve, DAB takes less time. Although time limits increase efficiency relative to arbitration, the ICC rules set time limits for the tribunal’s formation and for submission of rejoinders, but not for the issuance of an award. DIAC rules however set a three-month limit that can be extended to five, from the date of transfer of the case from DIAC to the tribunal .en_US
dc.identifier.other20002824
dc.identifier.urihttps://bspace.buid.ac.ae/handle/1234/2202
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherThe British University in Dubai (BUiD)en_US
dc.subjectarbitrationen_US
dc.subjectconstruction disputeen_US
dc.subjectdispute resolutionen_US
dc.subjectconstruction industryen_US
dc.subjectDispute Adjudication Boards (DAB)en_US
dc.subjectUnited Arab Emirates (UAE)en_US
dc.titleA Comparative study of DAB and Arbitration as methods of resolving Construction Disputesen_US
dc.typeDissertationen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Name:
20002824.pdf
Size:
1.63 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: